Category Archives: Tax Evasion

Income Tax – Three individuals to be charged for tax evasion of rental income


It was reported on IRAS’ website on 16 March 2018 that 3 individuals were charged in the court in 2 separate cases for tax evasion on their rental income.

  • 2 persons were charged on 16 March 2018, for the omission of rental income from their tax returns.  More specifically, one of them faced 4 charges involving omitted rental income amounting to $411,252 for Years of Assessment (YAs) 2010 to 2013 which resulted in a total of $69,065.20 in tax undercharged. The other faced 3 charges involving omitted rental income amounting to $299,769 for YAs 2012 to 2014 which resulted in a total of $52,854.75 in tax undercharged. In addition, this individual will face another charge for the non-filing of his income tax returns.
  • One would be charged on 13 April 2018  for submitting falsified invoices to IRAS to support claims made for rental expenses between YAs 2009 to 2013. The individual will face 5 charges involving the submission of falsified invoices that amounted to $284,308.52. This resulted in a total of $56,499.91 in taxes undercharged.

Have a Question

Are you interested in joining our mailing list to receive our regular update on Singapore tax and international tax matters that may impact on your business?

Join Our Mailing List

Interested in Scheduling a Tax Consultation with us? Click here to Schedule a 30-Min Reduce Your Tax Bill Consultation with us:

Schedule Appointment

Advertisements

Income Tax – Director of metal stamping company to be charged for tax evasion


It was reported in IRAS’ website on 22 March 2018 that a company director was charged in court for assisting his company to evade tax.  He faced 5 charges involving the making of false entries in his company’s income tax returns from Years of Assessment (YAs) 2009 to 2013, which resulted in $648,427.90 in tax undercharged.

In addition, he will face 17 charges for without reasonable excuse, making an incorrect return by understating output tax in his company’s GST returns amounting to $266,870.58 during the same period.

What does this mean to you?

Upon conviction, he may face a penalty of two times the amount of tax undercharged, and a fine not exceeding $5,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years or to both.

Have a Question

Are you interested in joining our mailing list to receive our regular update on Singapore tax and international tax matters that may impact on your business?

Join Our Mailing List

Interested in Scheduling a Tax Consultation with us? Click here to Schedule a 30-Min Reduce Your Tax Bill Consultation with us:

Schedule Appointment

Singapore GST – Company Director Convicted for Unlawful GST Collection


It was reported in IRAS’ website on 19 Jan 2018 that Kumarselvam S/O Veejay Koumar, who was a director of MV Global Trading Pte Ltd, flouted the law when his company unlawfully charged GST on a total of 102 sales invoices issued to its customers.

IRAS’ investigations revealed that MV was not GST-registered and Kumarselvam knew that this is the case.  The offenses were detected only because of IRAS’ efforts in conducting checks on businesses before allowing any business to register for GST. Investigations further revealed that Kumarselvam was the person in charge of managing and overseeing MV’s operations at the relevant time.  He had personally prepared and issued 3 of the 34 sales invoices and instructed his staff to prepare and issue the other sales invoices to customers, which charged the prevailing rate of GST on these sales. The “GST” amount was reflected on the said invoices issued.

As MV was not GST-registered, it did not file any GST returns or account for the “GST” collected from MV’s customers to the Comptroller of GST.

In the end, Kumarsalvam pleaded guilty to the 34 charges proceeded on. For being a director when MV unlawfully charged $3,791.21 as GST, the court sentenced Kumarselvam to a penalty of $11,373.63, which is 3X the amount shown as tax, and a fine totaling $51,000. In default of paying the penalty and fine, he has to serve a total of 125 days’ imprisonment. Another 68 similar charges were taken into consideration in sentencing.

What does this mean to you? 

It is a serious offense for businesses that are not GST-registered to charge and collect GST from their customers. Offenders face a penalty of three times the amount of tax unlawfully collected and a fine of up to $10,000 for each offense.

Please take note that IRAS conducts audits to identify non-compliance with GST laws, including checks on whether businesses charge and collect GST correctly.

Have a Question

Are you interested in joining our mailing list to receive our regular update on Singapore tax and international tax matters that may impact on your business?

Join Our Mailing List

Interested in Scheduling a Tax Consultation with us? Click here to Schedule a 30-Min Reduce Your Tax Bill Consultation with us:

Schedule Appointment

Singapore GST – Businessman Guilty of GST Fraud, Sentenced to 24 Weeks’ Imprisonment


It was reported in the IRAS’  website on 20 October 2017 that
Foo Tee Suan (“Foo”), who was the sole-proprietor of FTH Enterprise (“FTH”), partner of F&T Top System Enterprise (“F&T”) and Hwa Rong Import & Export (“HRIE”) and director of Hwa Rong Enterprise Pte Ltd (“HREPL”), has been convicted of making false entries in the GST returns of the four business entities which resulted in GST refunds totalling $458,019.69.

One of Foo’s business entities, F&T, was audited by IRAS during one of its regular audits of GST-registered businesses. During the course of the audit, IRAS’ auditors discovered that Foo had made false entries in the GST returns of F&T. The audit further discovered that Foo had also made false entries in the GST returns of three other business entities that he was involved in.

Foo’s scheme to commit GST tax fraud first began with a suggestion from Eric Chia Puay Yeoh (“Chia”), who was convicted in July 2014 of masterminding a complex GST scam using multiple shell entities. Chia suggested to Foo to voluntarily register his export business, FTH Enterprise (FTH), for GST so that FTH could claim fictitious GST refunds. Thereafter, Foo set up three other entities that were all shell companies without any business transactions.

Foo, with willful intent to evade tax, signed blank GST return forms for the four business entities and provided Chia with his SingPass in order for Chia to e-file the GST return forms for the four business entities. To illegally obtain GST refunds, Chia declared fictitious figures in the GST returns and fraudulently claimed a total of $457,749.59 in GST refunds. Foo benefitted from the fictitious GST refunds that Chia obtained and used some of the GST refund monies for his own personal expenses.

Foo faced a total of 54 GST charges of wilful intent to evade tax by making false entries in the GST returns of the four business entities. He pleaded guilty to 18 out of the 54 GST evasion charges, involving a total GST amount of $172,314.90 undercharged, with the other 36 remaining GST evasion charges being taken into consideration for the purposes of sentencing. The Court sentenced Foo to 24 weeks’ imprisonment and ordered him to pay a penalty of $516,944.70, three times the amount of tax undercharged.

What does this mean to you?

GST-registered businesses are allowed to offset the GST they pay for their purchases (input tax) against the GST they collect from sales (output tax). They pay the net difference to IRAS. Those that incur more GST on purchases than they collect from their sales can claim the difference from IRAS in the form of GST refunds.

It is a serious offense to claim GST input tax on fictitious purchases or understate output tax on sales. Offenders face a penalty of three times the amount of tax undercharged, a fine not exceeding $10,000, and/or imprisonment of up to seven years.

If you have any questions, please contact support@whm-consulting.com

 

Singapore GST – Research Fellow Convicted of GST Tourist Refund Fraud


It was reported in IRAS’ website on 9 October 2017 that a research fellow, Bai Jiaming was convicted of the following GST offenses:

  • Engaging the help of a tourist to claim a GST refund of $1,543.93 for a $23,600 Tiffany & Co. diamond ring (the “ring”) purchased by him; and
  • Obtaining a Prada bag (the “handbag”) and the ring from the tourist after a GST refund of $1,791.87 had been claimed on the two items.

Investigations revealed that Bai colluded with his colleague, Zhang Baicheng and his colleague’s father, Zhang Yaoqun (“co-accused persons”) to carry out the GST refund fraud. Bai, the purchaser of the ring did not qualify for a GST refund under the Electronic Tourist Refund Scheme (“eTRS”) as he was not a tourist and was in fact, working in Singapore.  At Zhang Baicheng’s suggestion, Bai procured Zhang Yaoqun to obtain approval for a GST refund even though Zhang Yaoqun was not entitled to the said GST refund as he was not the purchaser of the ring.

On 11 Mar 2017, Bai, with a one-way air ticket to Jakarta bought on the previous day,  went with Zhang Baicheng and Zhang Yaoqun to the Singapore Changi International Airport. Zhang Baicheng and Zhang Yaoqun had return air tickets for Bangkok. All three checked in at their respective ticket counters and entered the transit area. Thereafter, Zhang Yaoqun made the GST refund claim for the handbag and the ring at the transit area in Changi International Airport, Terminal 3. Zhang Yaoqun had the said handbag and ring in his possession at the time that the GST refund was approved.

After obtaining approval for a GST refund, Zhang Yaoqun gave the handbag and ring to Zhang Baicheng who in turn gave them to Bai. Bai knew that Zhang Yaoqun had obtained approval for a GST refund of $1,791.87 under the eTRS in respect of both the handbag and ring. Bai then attempted to leave the transit area with the handbag and ring and was stopped by an ICA officer for suspected misuse of a boarding pass.

Both Zhang Baicheng and Zhang Yaoqun were charged on 28 Jul 2017 for their offenses and their cases are still pending before the court.

The court sentenced Bai to a total fine of $7,000. If he defaults on payment of the fine, he will have to serve four weeks’ imprisonment.

What does this mean to you?

IRAS takes a serious view of anyone who makes false declarations to seek GST refunds under the tourist refund scheme and abuses the scheme.    Under the GST Regulation, a person commits an offense for receiving goods from a tourist, directly or indirectly, knowing that the tourist has obtained approval for the refund. The person also commits an offense for engaging another person to seek or obtain an approval for a refund under the tourist refund scheme. Offenders shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $5,000 and in default of payment to an imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months.

If you have any questions regarding the above, contact support@whm-consulting.com