Category Archives: Income Tax

Income Tax – Wholesale Trader and Company to Pay Penalties of $169,194.60 and Fine of $5,000 for False PIC Claim


It was reported in IRAS’ website on 21 July 2017 that Chin Jin Han (“Chin“), who was running a wholesale trading company, Mah Sing Pte. Ltd (“Mah Sing”), has been convicted of providing false information in the company’s Productivity and Innovation Credit (“PIC”) cash payout application form.

Chin submitted a PIC cash payout application form to IRAS, under Mah Sing’s name, in Apr 2013. He obtained the signature of Mah Sing’s sole director, his mother-in-law who left the running of the business to him, and completed all the required fields in the PIC cash payout application form.

IRAS’ Investigations revealed that Mah Sing did not purchase the two servers and three workstations (“the equipment”) at the purported cost of $93,997, as declared in the PIC cash payout application form. The invoices that showed the purchase of the equipment were false.

Both Mah Sing and Chin were convicted of giving false information to the Comptroller of Income Tax, in order to obtain a PIC cash payout and Bonus which the company was not entitled to.

The court ordered the company to pay a penalty of $56,398.20 which is a one-time penalty of the amount of the PIC cash payout that was wrongfully claimed.

Chin was convicted of giving false information to the Comptroller of Income Tax to assist Mah Sing to obtain a PIC cash payout, which Mah Sing was not entitled to when no such purchase had in fact taken place. The court ordered Chin Jin Han to pay a penalty of $112,796.40, which is two times the amount of PIC cash payout that was wrongfully claimed, and a fine of $5,000.

What does this mean to you?

IRAS takes a serious view of any attempt by claimants, vendors or consultants to defraud the Government. Under the Income Tax Act, anyone convicted of an offence of abusing the PIC scheme will have to pay a penalty of up to four times the amount of PIC cash payout fraudulently obtained or which would have been obtained if the offence had not been detected, and a fine of up to $50,000 and/or imprisonment of up to five years.

If you have any questions, contact support@whm-consulting.com.

Income Tax – Director Behind PIC Sham Convicted


It was reported in IRAS’ website on 20 July 2017 that Selladorai Dharmalingam (“Selladorai”), the sole director of Al Bright Construction Pte. Ltd. (“Al Bright”), has been convicted and sentenced for abusing the Productivity and Innovation Credit (PIC) scheme by giving false information to illegally obtain a PIC cash payout and bonus for Al Bright.

IRAS’ investigation revealed that Selladorai authorized the submission of the PIC Cash Payout Application Form by Al Bright to claim $50,461.20 in PIC cash payout and $15,000 in PIC bonus, for the purported expenditure of $84,102 to purchase an electric overhead crane.  However, there was no such expenditure incurred by Al Bright nor any such equipment was purchased.

Selladorai was convicted of giving false information to the Comptroller of Income Tax in order to obtain a PIC cash payout and PIC bonus which the company Al Bright was not entitled to. The court ordered Selladorai to pay a fine of $3,500 and a penalty of $100,922.40, twice the amount of PIC cash payout that Al Bright had wrongfully obtained, and sentenced him to 12 weeks’ imprisonment in default of payment.

What does this mean to you?

IRAS takes a serious view of any attempt by claimants, vendors or consultants to defraud the Government. Offenders convicted of PIC fraud will have to pay a penalty of up to four times the amount of cash payout fraudulently obtained, or which would have been obtained if the offence had not been detected, and a fine of up to $50,000 and/or imprisonment of up to five years.

If you have any questions, contact us at support@whm-consulting.com.

Income Tax – Public Consultation on Draft Income Tax (Amendment) Bill 2017


The Ministry of Finance has published for public consultation the Draft Income Tax (Amendment) Bill 2017 to incorporate 34 proposed legislative amendments, including:

1.   Eight Budget 2017 changes, including

  •  Enhancement and extension of the Corporate Income Tax (CIT) rebate for Year of Assessment (YA) 2017 and YA 2018.
  • Introduction of the Personal Income Tax rebate of 20% (capped at S$500) for YA 2017.
  • Liberalisation of the tax deduction for payments under Cost Sharing Agreements (CSAs) for Research and Development (R&D) projects.

2.  Amendment to introduce mandatory Transfer Pricing Documentation Requirement 

To limit compliance burden for smaller businesses, the mandatory TPD requirement will only apply to businesses with a turnover exceeding $10m and significantly related party transactions. The majority of companies will not be affected, as this change will only be relevant to fewer than 5% of all companies, many of which have already been maintaining TPD.

3. 25 Other non-budget changes including

  • Amendments relating to third-party voluntary contributions to the Medisave accounts of private sector employees and self-employed persons (SEPs).
  • Changes to enable the Minister for Finance to implement Singapore’s obligations under the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS).

The consultation exercise will end on 10 July 2017.

If you have any questions regarding the above, contact us at support@whm-consulting.com.

Income Tax – Robotic Ice-Cream Machine Dealer Convicted of False PIC Claim


It was reported in IRAS’ website on 27 April 2017 that
Robofusion Asia Pte Ltd (“Robofusion”) has been convicted of giving false information in the Productivity and Innovation Credit (“PIC“) cash payout application form.  Its director, Yong Tai Kok (“Yong“) has also been convicted of his role in assisting Robofusion in making the false PIC Claim.

IRAS’ investigation

IRAS’ Investigations revealed that Yong obtained the consent of two other people who were not employees of Robofusion, to use their names in Robofusion’s PIC cash payout application form dated 23 May 2013.  Robofusion made CPF contributions to their Central Provident Fund accounts in order to represent them as Robofusion’s local employees when in fact they were not.

Robofusion’s PIC cash payout application was for the purchase of “Robofusion Generation 4 Ice Cream Kiosk” costing $93,000 on 28 Feb 2013 and “Software License and Implementation for Cashless Payment System and Kiosk Payment Integration” costing $14,980 on 29 Apr 2013. The amount of PIC cash payout which was wrongfully obtained was $60,000.

Eventually … 

The court ordered Robofusion to pay a penalty of $60,000 for the PIC cash payout that it was not entitled to.

Yong was convicted of intentionally aiding Robofusion to, without reasonable excuse, give false information to the Comptroller of Income Tax to obtain a PIC cash payout which the company was not entitled to.  The court ordered Yong to pay a penalty of $120,000, which is twice the amount of PIC cash payout that was wrongfully claimed and a fine of $4,000.

If you have any questions, please contact support@whm-consulting.com

Income Tax – Revised e-Tax Guide on Tax Exemption Under Section 13(12) of the ITA


On 31 March 2017, the IRAS reissued the e-Tax Guide on Tax Exemption Under Section 13(12) of the Income Tax Act.

The tax exemption scheme for infrastructure foreign income will expire on 31 Dec 2022 (unless specifically revoked earlier). Accordingly, where the section 13(12) declaration form is submitted to IRAS after 31 Dec 2022, the infrastructure foreign income will not enjoy the tax exemption, unless the scheme is extended.

If you have any questions, please contact support@whm-consulting.com.


Visit my  Blog | FB FanPage | LinkedIn | Google+

  • 144-Second Video Revealing Why I Do What I Do: Click here
  • Arrange for a 30-Minute FREE Discovery Session (Value: USD5,000): Click here 
  • Use our scientifically proven tool to supercharge your sales by up to 300%: Click here
  • Find out how you can join my team as a trainer and consultant in Sales: Click here
Disclaimer – The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, transmission, dissemination or other use of, taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by person or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.  Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of WHM Consulting Pte Ltd.